Juan Redmond
Universidad de Valparaiso, Instituto de Filosofía, Faculty Member
- Universidad de Valparaiso, CFCULisboa, juan.redmond@uv.cl, Faculty Memberadd
- POSICIÓN ACTUAL OCTUBRE 2018 Profesor Titular Jornada Completa del Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad de Valparaíso;... morePOSICIÓN ACTUAL OCTUBRE 2018
Profesor Titular Jornada Completa del Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad de Valparaíso; Doctor en Filosofía Universidad de Lille 3 (Francia), 2010. Master en Literatura, Universidad de Lille 3 (France), 2011. Licenciado en Filosofía, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (Argentina), 1999 y homologado Universidad de Chile, 2016. Profesor de Filosofía, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (Argentina), 1995 y homologado Universidad de Chile, 2016. Actualmente: Director del Centro de Estudios en Filosofía, Lógica y Epistemología (CeFiLoE, Instituto de Filosofía, UV). http://www.cefiloe.cl/; Director (junto a Shahid Rahman) de la serie LOGIC, ARGUMENTATION & REASONING (ISSN: 2214-9120), editorial Springer (http://www.springer.com/series/11547); Director (junto a Shahid Rahman) de la serie Cuadernos de Lógica, Epistemología y Lenguaje, Editorial College Publications, Londres, Inglaterra (Dov Gabbay, King’s College) http://www.collegepublications.co.uk; Director de la Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, Ed. del Instituto de Filosofía de la Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile, ISSN 0719-4242 (ERIH Plus); Director de la Serie SELECCIÓN DE TEXTOS, Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad de Valparaíso. Publicaciones destacadas de los últimos tres años: Rahman, Shahid & Clerbout, Nicolas & Redmond, Juan. “Interacción e igualdad. La interpretación dialógica de la teoría constructiva de tipos”. Revista CRITICA-Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía (ISI-WoS) ISSN 0011-1503 Vol. 49, No 145 (abril 2017): 49-89; Redmond, J. et allia (Editores). Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction. Serie LEUS (Dir: Shahid Rahman), 2016, Springer, ISBN 978-3-319-26504-9; Rahman, Shahid & Redmond, Juan. “Armonía Dialógica: tonk, Teoría Constructiva de Tipos y Reglas para Jugadores Anónimos” en Revista THEORIA (ISI-WoS), Volume 31/1, January 2016, ISSN 0495-4548, pp. 27-53. BIBLID 0495-4548(2016)31:1p.27-53; DOI: 10.1387/theoria.13949; Rahman, Shahid & Redmond, Juan. “A Dialogical Frame for Fictions as Hypothetical Objects”. Revista UNISINOS (ISI-WoS), Vol 16, No 1 (2015): January/April, pp. 2-21, ISSN 1984-8234 DOI: 10.4013/fsu.2015.161.01edit
El coloquio internacional Conceptos y Lenguajes en Ciencia. Modelos, Objetos y Entornos Epistémicos (CLeCi 2014) tuvo lugar en la Universidad de Valparaíso los días 4 y 5 de diciembre de 2014. En esta ocasión, además de docentes y... more
El coloquio internacional Conceptos y Lenguajes en Ciencia. Modelos, Objetos y Entornos Epistémicos (CLeCi 2014) tuvo lugar en la Universidad de Valparaíso los días 4 y 5 de diciembre de 2014. En esta ocasión, además de docentes y profesionales locales, contamos con un número considerable de participantes de Argentina, de la Universidad Tecnológica Nacional (Regional Mendoza) y de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Ambas instituciones han forjado una estrecha relación con la Universidad de Valparaíso, por medio de la organización de eventos académicos, intercambio de docentes y colaboraciones en proyectos de investigación.
La convocatoria para participar fue amplia y requería la presentación de los trabajos completos antes de su exposición en el coloquio. Después de realizado el CLeCi 2014 se efectuó una selección de dichos trabajos y este libro corresponde a la edición de los mismos. Cabe agregar que una de las características de esta publicación colectiva es la diversidad de temas, enfoques e intereses presentados que se encuentran articulados temáticamente por la reflexión sobre Conceptos y Lenguajes en Ciencia, Modelos en Ciencia y Entornos Epistémicos.
La diversidad señalada genera una perspectiva multidisciplinaria en la que participan lógica, epistemología, ingeniería, matemática, semiótica, sistémica, educación, neuroestética e informática de las que surgen temas como: modelos matemáticos y numéricos, problemas de inconmensurabilidad, dispositivos de aislamiento sísmico, modelos relacionados con la belleza, morfogénesis, lenguajes y descripciones, ficciones, elección racional de teorías, principios de la ciencia, la información y la educación. De esta manera, profesionales con diferentes formaciones -orientados por la temática de la convocatoria- realizaron una actividad reflexiva que llama la atención por los intereses que despierta…
La convocatoria para participar fue amplia y requería la presentación de los trabajos completos antes de su exposición en el coloquio. Después de realizado el CLeCi 2014 se efectuó una selección de dichos trabajos y este libro corresponde a la edición de los mismos. Cabe agregar que una de las características de esta publicación colectiva es la diversidad de temas, enfoques e intereses presentados que se encuentran articulados temáticamente por la reflexión sobre Conceptos y Lenguajes en Ciencia, Modelos en Ciencia y Entornos Epistémicos.
La diversidad señalada genera una perspectiva multidisciplinaria en la que participan lógica, epistemología, ingeniería, matemática, semiótica, sistémica, educación, neuroestética e informática de las que surgen temas como: modelos matemáticos y numéricos, problemas de inconmensurabilidad, dispositivos de aislamiento sísmico, modelos relacionados con la belleza, morfogénesis, lenguajes y descripciones, ficciones, elección racional de teorías, principios de la ciencia, la información y la educación. De esta manera, profesionales con diferentes formaciones -orientados por la temática de la convocatoria- realizaron una actividad reflexiva que llama la atención por los intereses que despierta…
Research Interests:
With this volume of the series Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science edited by S. Rahman et al. a challenging dialogue is being continued. The series’ first volume argued that one way to recover the connections between logic,... more
With this volume of the series Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science edited by S. Rahman et al. a challenging dialogue is being continued. The series’ first volume argued that one way to recover the connections between logic, philosophy of sciences, and sciences is to acknowledge the host of alternative logics which are currently being developed. The present volume focuses on four key themes. First of all, several chapters unpack the connection between knowledge and epistemology with particular focus on the notion of knowledge as resulting from interaction. Secondly, new epistemological perspectives on linguistics, the foundations of mathematics and logic, physics, biology and law are a subject of analysis. Thirdly, several chapters are dedicated to a discussion of Constructive Type Theory and more generally of the proof-theoretical notion of meaning. Finally, the book brings together studies on the epistemic role of abduction and argumentation theory, both linked to non-monotonic approaches to the dynamics of knowledge.
Research Interests:
Logique Dynamique de la Fiction is a masterly piece of work and a substantial contribution to a disciplined understanding of human thought and discourse about the unreal. It is, in that very respect, a logic working at the very heart of... more
Logique Dynamique de la Fiction is a masterly piece
of work and a substantial contribution to a disciplined
understanding of human thought and discourse about
the unreal. It is, in that very respect, a logic working at
the very heart of les sciences humaines. M. Redmond’s
command of the literature – actually of the several
literatures associated with each of the constituent parts of
his synthesis – is not only substantial and comprehensive;
it is also rather breath-taking. Equally impressive is the
technical assurance displayed by the formal development
of the constituent logics, and the virtuosity with which
they are adapted to the purposes of his project. […] On
the other hand, I fi nd myself rather captivated by the
insight that the practices of fi ction – its writing and its
reading – possess an inherently dialogical structure, and
with it, the idea that to get the semantics of fi ction right
it will be necessary to dynamize the underlying logic.
[John Woods]
of work and a substantial contribution to a disciplined
understanding of human thought and discourse about
the unreal. It is, in that very respect, a logic working at
the very heart of les sciences humaines. M. Redmond’s
command of the literature – actually of the several
literatures associated with each of the constituent parts of
his synthesis – is not only substantial and comprehensive;
it is also rather breath-taking. Equally impressive is the
technical assurance displayed by the formal development
of the constituent logics, and the virtuosity with which
they are adapted to the purposes of his project. […] On
the other hand, I fi nd myself rather captivated by the
insight that the practices of fi ction – its writing and its
reading – possess an inherently dialogical structure, and
with it, the idea that to get the semantics of fi ction right
it will be necessary to dynamize the underlying logic.
[John Woods]
Research Interests:
Hugh MacColl (1837-1909) was a mathematician and logician who was born, raised and educated in Scotland and after a few years working in different areas of Great Britain moved to Boulogne-sur-Mer (France), where he developed the greater... more
Hugh MacColl (1837-1909) was a mathematician and logician
who was born, raised and educated in Scotland and after a few
years working in different areas of Great Britain moved to Boulogne-sur-Mer (France), where he developed the greater part of his work and went on to become a French citizen. Hugh MacColl was well known in his time for his innovative contributions to logic. Despite the fact that one can hardly say that his work satisfies the standards of rigour of Frege’s philosophy of mathematics and logic it might represent one of the first approaches to logical pluralism. His first contribution to the logical algebras of the 19th century was that his calculus
admits not only a class interpretation (as in the algebra of Boole) but also a propositional one. Moreover, MacColl gave preference to the propositional interpretation because of its generality and called it pure logic. The main connective in his pure logic is the conditional and accordingly his algebra contains a specific operator for this connective. In Symbolic Logic and its Applications (1906) (reprinted in our volume) MacColl published the final version of his logic(s) where propositions are qualified as either certain, impossible, contingent, true or false. After his death his work suffered a sad destiny. Contrary to other contemporary logicians such as L. Couturat, G. Frege, W.S. Jevons, J. Venn, G. Peano, C.S. Pierce, B. Russell and E. Schröder, who knew MacColl’s work, his contributions seem to have received neither the acknowledgement nor the systematic study they certainly deserve. Moreover, many of his ideas were attributed to his successors; the most notorious examples are the notion of strict implication, the first formal approach to modal logic and the discussion of the paradoxes of material implication normally attributed to C.I. Lewis. The same applies to his contributions to probability logic (conditional probability), (relational) many-valued logic, relevant logic and connexive logic. Less known is the fact that he also explored the possibilities of building a formal system able to handle reasoning with fictions. The latter seems to be linked to his formal reconstruction of Aristotelian Syllogism by means of connexive logic. The present volume includes a reprint of MacColl’s main writings on logic.
who was born, raised and educated in Scotland and after a few
years working in different areas of Great Britain moved to Boulogne-sur-Mer (France), where he developed the greater part of his work and went on to become a French citizen. Hugh MacColl was well known in his time for his innovative contributions to logic. Despite the fact that one can hardly say that his work satisfies the standards of rigour of Frege’s philosophy of mathematics and logic it might represent one of the first approaches to logical pluralism. His first contribution to the logical algebras of the 19th century was that his calculus
admits not only a class interpretation (as in the algebra of Boole) but also a propositional one. Moreover, MacColl gave preference to the propositional interpretation because of its generality and called it pure logic. The main connective in his pure logic is the conditional and accordingly his algebra contains a specific operator for this connective. In Symbolic Logic and its Applications (1906) (reprinted in our volume) MacColl published the final version of his logic(s) where propositions are qualified as either certain, impossible, contingent, true or false. After his death his work suffered a sad destiny. Contrary to other contemporary logicians such as L. Couturat, G. Frege, W.S. Jevons, J. Venn, G. Peano, C.S. Pierce, B. Russell and E. Schröder, who knew MacColl’s work, his contributions seem to have received neither the acknowledgement nor the systematic study they certainly deserve. Moreover, many of his ideas were attributed to his successors; the most notorious examples are the notion of strict implication, the first formal approach to modal logic and the discussion of the paradoxes of material implication normally attributed to C.I. Lewis. The same applies to his contributions to probability logic (conditional probability), (relational) many-valued logic, relevant logic and connexive logic. Less known is the fact that he also explored the possibilities of building a formal system able to handle reasoning with fictions. The latter seems to be linked to his formal reconstruction of Aristotelian Syllogism by means of connexive logic. The present volume includes a reprint of MacColl’s main writings on logic.
Research Interests: Philosophy and Logic
Escribir un paper 1 (artículo) en filosofía 2. (Para uso exclusivo e interno del ramo Taller II de primer año de la Pedagogía en Filosofía) ¿Es posible escribir un paper en filosofía? Dos posibles respuestas: 1. NO, dediquémonos a otra... more
Escribir un paper 1 (artículo) en filosofía 2.
(Para uso exclusivo e interno del ramo Taller II de primer año de la Pedagogía en Filosofía)
¿Es posible escribir un paper en filosofía?
Dos posibles respuestas:
1. NO, dediquémonos a otra cosa.
2. Sí.
En este texto no defenderemos ni una ni la otra. En este texto nos proponemos ver hasta qué punto es posible sostener la segunda respuesta (Sí) proponiendo una idea de cómo es-cribir un paper en filosofía
(Para uso exclusivo e interno del ramo Taller II de primer año de la Pedagogía en Filosofía)
¿Es posible escribir un paper en filosofía?
Dos posibles respuestas:
1. NO, dediquémonos a otra cosa.
2. Sí.
En este texto no defenderemos ni una ni la otra. En este texto nos proponemos ver hasta qué punto es posible sostener la segunda respuesta (Sí) proponiendo una idea de cómo es-cribir un paper en filosofía
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
... Cited By in Scopus (0). Permissions & Reprints. Hugh Maccoll and the birth of logical pluralism.Shahid Rahman and Juan Redmond. Available online 16 April 2008. Excerpt. Note:This is a one-page preview only. Enable JavaScript for... more
... Cited By in Scopus (0). Permissions & Reprints. Hugh Maccoll and the birth of logical pluralism.Shahid Rahman and Juan Redmond. Available online 16 April 2008. Excerpt. Note:This is a one-page preview only. Enable JavaScript for PDF Excerpt to view it inline. LOADING... ...
Research Interests:
Infinity arises in mathematics in two places...
Research Interests:
Recent work on the development of a dialogical approach to the logic of fiction stresses the notion of existence as choice. Moreover, this approach to existence has been combined with the notion of ontological dependence as deployed by A.... more
Recent work on the development of a dialogical approach to the logic of fiction stresses the notion of existence as choice. Moreover, this approach to existence has been combined with the notion of ontological dependence as deployed by A. Thomasson’s artefactual theory of fiction. In order to implement such a combination within the dialogical frame several predicates of ontological dependence have been defined. However, the definition of such predicates seems to lean on a model-theoretic semantics for modal logic after all.
The main of the present paper is to set a dialogical frame for the study of fictions in the context of the dialogical ap-proach of CTT recently developed by S. Rahman and N. Clerbout where a fully-interpreted language is unfolded. We will herewith develop the idea that in such a setting fictional entities are understood as hypothetical objects, that is, ob-jects (functions), the existence of which is dependent upon one or more hypotheses that restrict the scope of choices available. We will finish the paper by suggesting that this provides both a natural and genuinely dialogical way to un-derstand R. Frigg’s take on scientific models as fictions and a new perspective on Thomasson’s notion of generic onto-logical dependence.
The main of the present paper is to set a dialogical frame for the study of fictions in the context of the dialogical ap-proach of CTT recently developed by S. Rahman and N. Clerbout where a fully-interpreted language is unfolded. We will herewith develop the idea that in such a setting fictional entities are understood as hypothetical objects, that is, ob-jects (functions), the existence of which is dependent upon one or more hypotheses that restrict the scope of choices available. We will finish the paper by suggesting that this provides both a natural and genuinely dialogical way to un-derstand R. Frigg’s take on scientific models as fictions and a new perspective on Thomasson’s notion of generic onto-logical dependence.
Research Interests: Critical Theory, Cognitive Science, Modal Logic, Computer Science, Philosophy, and 24 moreMetaphysics, Ontology, Philosophy of Mind, Philosophy Of Language, Philosophy of Science, Logic, Pragmatics, Literature, Critical Thinking, Dialogue, Phenomenology, Literary Theory, Edmund Husserl, Argumentation, Modality, Intentionality, Wittgenstein, Linguistics, Dialectic, Possible Worlds, Literatura, Dialogical logic, History and Philosophy of Logic, and Fictional Objects
En este trabajo me propongo mostrar que, en el cuento Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius de Jorge Luis Borges, las nociones de vida y muerte de las ficciones prefiguran una idea de ficción que es posible desentrañar desde una perspectiva... more
En este trabajo me propongo mostrar que, en el cuento Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius de Jorge Luis Borges, las nociones de vida y muerte de las ficciones prefiguran una idea de ficción que es posible desentrañar desde una perspectiva artefactual (Thomasson, 1999). En efecto, un enfoque que postule las ficciones como realidades abstractas y dependientes (artefactos) hará posible abrir nuevos significados y se torna de este modo en precursora de la propuesta borgesiana.
Research Interests:
Defendemos en nuestro trabajo que la perspectiva lúdica de la lógica dialógica, por su estructura dinámica enmarcada en las lógicas de la interacción y los flujos de información, es un enfoque óptimo para que niñas y niños aprendan a... more
Defendemos en nuestro trabajo que la perspectiva lúdica de la lógica dialógica, por su estructura dinámica enmarcada en las lógicas de la interacción y los flujos de información, es un enfoque óptimo para que niñas y niños aprendan a dirimir discusiones sobre la pertinencia o no de ciertas conclusiones que se desprenden de ciertas premisas en el marco del análisis de argumentos, como propuesta de contenido para la enseñanza de filosofía para niñas y niños en la escuela media básica.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The following book is an edition of College Publications and the research group Pragmatisme Dialogique headed by Shahid Rahman at the Univer-sity of Lille 3 – Charles-de-Gaulle and in collaboration with the laboratory Savoirs, Textes,... more
The following book is an edition of College Publications and the research group Pragmatisme Dialogique headed by Shahid Rahman at the Univer-sity of Lille 3 – Charles-de-Gaulle and in collaboration with the laboratory Savoirs, Textes, Langage (Unité Mixte de Recherche 8163, Lille 3).
How to play Dialogues constitutes the first introduction to Dialogical Logic aimed at the practice of dialogic containing precise comments on solu-tions to exercises in first-order classical, intuitionistic and elements of proposi-tional modal logic. It is the first part of the work The Dialogues of Logic, conceived in two separate autonomous texts on dialogical logic. The two texts should provide together a comprehensive technical and philosophical overview of the dialogical approach to logic.
How to play Dialogues constitutes the first introduction to Dialogical Logic aimed at the practice of dialogic containing precise comments on solu-tions to exercises in first-order classical, intuitionistic and elements of proposi-tional modal logic. It is the first part of the work The Dialogues of Logic, conceived in two separate autonomous texts on dialogical logic. The two texts should provide together a comprehensive technical and philosophical overview of the dialogical approach to logic.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
La lógica experimenta actualmente un crecimiento vertiginoso. Acompañada de un impulso inter y transdisciplinario, se despliega como un saber que transforma la naturaleza de las nociones de epistemolog&iacure;a y semántica. Es hora de que... more
La lógica experimenta actualmente un crecimiento vertiginoso. Acompañada de un impulso inter y transdisciplinario, se despliega como un saber que transforma la naturaleza de las nociones de epistemolog&iacure;a y semántica. Es hora de que los filósofos se confronten a los problemas y a las nuevas preguntas esbozadas por estos avances. En verdad es manifiesto que hay ya algunos emprendimientos importantes en ese sentido. Emprendimientos que contribuyen en la exploración de nuevas direcciones del rol de la lógica como organon. El objetivo principal de nuestra colección es precisamente promover la publicación y traducción de obras en lengua castellana sobre lógica, filosofía de la lógica, filosofía de la ciencia, epistemología y semántica de la lenguas naturales. Esperamos que un tal foro de publicación fomentará la consolidación de vínculos ya existentes entre las disciplinas mencionadas y la construcción de nuevos lazos inter- y transdisciplinarios.
Research Interests:
La Serie Selección de Textos, junto con la Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, es la producción editorial del Instituto de Filosofía de la Facultad de Humanidades de Valparaíso. Nace en el año 2013 con el propósito de abrir un espacio... more
La Serie Selección de Textos, junto con la Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, es la producción editorial del Instituto de Filosofía de la Facultad de Humanidades de Valparaíso. Nace en el año 2013 con el propósito de abrir un espacio para las publicaciones en el área de las humanidades en nuestro país. La Serie es dirigida por el profesor Juan Redmond y su Comité Científico lo componen destacados académicos nacionales e internacionales, cuya responsabilidad es asegurar la calidad de las publicaciones.
Research Interests:
Envía tu artículo / Send your paper / envoyez votre article La Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso (RHV) es editada por el Instituto de Filosofía de la Facultad de Humanidades de la Universidad de Valparaíso desde el año 2013. Su... more
Envía tu artículo / Send your paper / envoyez votre article
La Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso (RHV) es editada por el Instituto de Filosofía de la Facultad de Humanidades de la Universidad de Valparaíso desde el año 2013. Su periodicidad de publicación es semestral y está destinada a divulgar trabajos inéditos propios del ámbito de las humanidades. La Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso no se suscribe a ninguna doctrina particular y está abierta a artículos de diferentes perspectivas y con un alcance internacional.
Directores: Juan Redmond & Adolfo Vera
http://www.revistafilosofiauv.cl/
La Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso (RHV) es editada por el Instituto de Filosofía de la Facultad de Humanidades de la Universidad de Valparaíso desde el año 2013. Su periodicidad de publicación es semestral y está destinada a divulgar trabajos inéditos propios del ámbito de las humanidades. La Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso no se suscribe a ninguna doctrina particular y está abierta a artículos de diferentes perspectivas y con un alcance internacional.
Directores: Juan Redmond & Adolfo Vera
http://www.revistafilosofiauv.cl/
