Abstract
In this paper I analyse different justifications for the claim that the minor premise of the libertarian argument is true, namely, intuition, van Inwagen’s argument from moral responsibility and an argument from rationality. I claim none of these is satisfactory. I conclude by suggesting a possible way of interpreting the meaning of the free will intuition libertarians claim we have.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
References
Allais M (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école americaine. Econometrica 21:503–546
Aristotle (1941) Nichomachean ethics. In: McKeon (ed) The basic works of Aristotle. Random House, New York
Arrow K (1951) Social choice and individual values. Yale University Press, New Haven
Churchland P (1970) The logical character of action-explanations. Philos Rev 79:214–236
de Mandeville B (1924) The fable of the bees: or private vices, public benefits, vol 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 1729
Dennett D (2003) Freedom evolves. Alan Lane, London
Frankfurt H (1971) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. J Philos 68:5–20
Frankfurt H (2009) The importance of what we care about—philosophical essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hodgson D (2012) Rationality + consciousness = free will. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hurley S, Nudds M (eds) (2006) Rational animals? Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jensen K, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science 318:107–109
Kagel JH (1987) Economics according to the rats (and pigeons too): What we have learned and what we hope to learn. In: Roth A (ed) Laboratory experimentation in economics: six points of view. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 155–192
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1982) The psychology of preferences. Sci Am 246:136–142
Lehrer K (1960) Can we know that we have free will by introspection? J Philos 57:145–157
Lichtenstein S, Slovic P (eds) (2006) The construction of preference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Newell A (1994) Unified theories of cognition. The Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA)
Ramsey FP (1931) Truth and probability (1926). In: Braithwaite RB (ed) The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 156–198
Russell B (1914) On scientific method in philosophy. In: Slater J (ed) The collected papers of Bertrand Russell, vol 8. Allen & Unwin, London, 1986
Savage LJ (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York
Schuck-Paim C, Kacelnik A (2002) Rationality in risk-sensitive foraging choices by starlings. Anim Behav 64:869–879
Stanovich KE (2013) Why humans are (sometimes) less rational than other animals: cognitive complexity and the axioms of rational choice. Think Reason 19:1–26
Tversky A (1969) Intransitivity of preferences. Psychol Rev 76:31–48
Tversky A (1975) A critique of expected utility theory: descriptive and normative considerations. Erkenntnis 9:163–173
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–455
Van Inwagen P (1983) An essay on free will. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Author information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zilhão, A. Free Will and Rationality. Axiomathes 25, 93–106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-014-9245-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Keywords
- Free will
- Libertarianism
- Intuition
- Argument from moral responsibility
- Rationality